Glen Arbor Sun
May 22, 2013
Stories About Us Contact Us Advertising Area Links Community Calendar Subscriptions & Email Updates Home

Posts Tagged ‘Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’

Will On the Narrows Marina expand on Big Glen Lake?

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

Residents express concerns over marina expansion: Township Board writes letter of concern to DEQ

By Michael Buhler and Jacob Wheeler
Sun editors

The Glen Arbor Township Board held a special meeting today to respond to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) regarding an application for a marina expansion on Big Glen Lake. On the Narrows Marina owner Conor McCahill seeks to add an additional 39 boat slips on a new dock, bringing the total to 46, as well as increase the moorings to 16. On the Narrows Marina is located on the M-22 state highway, just north of the Carl Oleson Memorial Bridge, which divides Big and Little Glen Lake.

Over 100 residents and interested neighbors listened in the gymnasium as the Board met to discuss the issue. Since this was a meeting and not a hearing, public comment was limited to the end of the session. Township Zoning Administrator Bob Hawley reviewed the requirements of the Resort zone, and noted that the marina and its structures are a non-conforming use of the property, grandfathered into the original 1975 zoning plan. He questioned whether an expansion would then make this a “more non-conforming use,” and necessitate the entire project to come into zoning compliance, which it then could not do.

After deliberation and audience input, the Board voted 4-0 to write a letter to the DEQ noting its concerns over parking, pedestrians, road safety, navigation at the bridge, water safety, and the potential for pollution. The Board also asked the DEQ to conduct a public hearing on the matter.

Andy DuPont, President of the Glen Lake Association (GLA), reported that he was assured by Robin Schmidt of the DEQ that the department plans to hold a public hearing, and that online links where citizens can comment on the application, and a PDF of the application itself, are available on the GLA website, www.GlenLakeAssociation.org. You can also comment on the DEQ’s website here and view the PDF here NarrowsMarinaExpansionApplication. The GLA and Township Board encourage everyone to make their views known to the DEQ, and the GLA website will share any updates on the application — as well the Glen Arbor Sun via GlenArbor.com.

On the DEQ application last month, McCahill wrote, “Due to high demand, we would like to expand our boat slip and mooring offerings. If permitted we would simply install additional freestanding seasonal docks and move and expand our mooring field. This would take place in Spring 2012. … There is very high demand for slips and moorings on Glen Lake that we currently cannot accommodate. … Following our pre-application meeting we adjusted our layout and design to exclude a boat ramp and any dredging activity. This will require more dock sections to be used, but eliminate dredging in the shallow areas.”

In an open letter to the Glen Lake community posted at On the Narrows Marina’s website today, the McCahill family wrote: “Our objective in seeking expansion is to provide more opportunities for others to have access to the lake. We have a long waiting list from local residents seeking lake access for their boats. Most of our mooring customers are members of the local community and favor having boat slips as opposed to moorings. While we anticipated there would be opposing opinions, some quite legitimate and others self centered, the first step in the process is to comply with state law which we know will inevitably lead to a public hearing where we look forward to answering questions, addressing concerns and hopefully finding solutions that allow further access to a wonderful natural resource for Glen Lake residents, families and visitors.”

On the Narrows Marina’s expansion plans on Big Glen Lake have spread like wildfire through the local media. TV 7&4 news jumped on the story on Tuesday, quoting resident Kathy Schmid, who owns a home on the lake, as saying she’s worried that “peaceful summers on Glen Lake will turn into a crowded party atmosphere with the expansion.” Schmid also worries that the area wouldn’t be able to accommodate extra parking or restrooms that would be needed for the influx of visitors.

On Wednesday, the Traverse City Record-Eagle described On the Narrows as a “sleepy little marina” and quoted Kathy’s brother Greg Schmid as saying, “I think this is the first robber baron taking advantage of us being called the most beautiful place in America. I think by next year we’ll lose that designation.” The Schmids worry that the addition of nearly 40 boat slips will turn the Glen Lakes into “another party spot like Torch Lake.”

“They are valid concerns,” Conor McCahill told the Sun. “From our point of view, we don’t see why we can’t work with the community to address them and get something done. We take the lake very seriously, and we’re not looking to cause any harm. We’re just looking to expand and meet demand on the lake.”

McCahill conceded that parking is an issue in the congested area north of the Narrows Bridge. He suggested that the parking lot in front of “McCahill’s Crossing” — the former Narrows Dairy Bar, which will re-open this summer — is a possible solution.

“Parking is an issue. But it’s an issue throughout Glen Arbor too. There are different options in our plan. We own the property across the bridge. We could perhaps do a shuttle service.”

McCahill sought to address concerns that the expansion will overcrowd the lake with traffic.

“Our goal, as far as the expansion is concerned, is to allow more people to use the lake. It’s a misconception that the lake will all of a sudden become overcrowded with boat traffic. Our clientele are mostly people from the community who are already on the lake. They just want to put their boat somewhere where they don’t have to use the ramp every single day.”

The McCahills contracted the Traverse City-based surveying and engineering firm Gourdie-Fraser to investigate riparian rights and bottomlands where the docks and moorings would go. Conor McCahill believes that On the Narrows owns the riparian rights south of the marina.

“People are under the impression that that is not our land, but we went through the process, and it is,” he said. “All we’re looking for is an opportunity to work with the community to get this accomplished. If the plan goes through and we have a separate pier, that’s just another place where people can park their boats. Another avenue, so the lake is not as congested.”

Tom and Carol McCahill, and their three adult children, Conor, Megan and Neil, originally from Littleton, Colo., purchased the marina from Jack and Marcie Ferris in 2008 and re-opened it in 2009. Read our feature on the McCahills here. They recently acquired the former Dairy Bar on the south side of the Glen Lake narrows and plan to open that soon. Last summer, employees of On the Narrows won the adoration of the community when they saved a tiny fawn from drowning in Big Glen Lake.

Homestead, don’t pollute National Lakeshore!

Friday, August 5th, 2011

Dear Owners and Managers of The Homestead Resort,

This letter represents the views of an informal group of citizens who are concerned about the impact that your sewage system is having on Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore. We believe that you wish to be a good neighbor of the National Lakeshore, and to be seen as such. However, your sewage spray system as it is presently configured and operated, is a serious problem. Outlined below are the basic facts of the situation as we see them. We welcome your thoughts on anything that you see differently.

• You have an easement for a “seepage area” within a certain defined area. If you can discharge your sewage effluent by means of a spray system without contaminating surrounding lands, that is considered to be a legal method. However, if there is periodic drifting of spray into surrounding Park areas, that is clearly not permitted. This has been stated repeatedly, such as in a 12/2/02 letter to you from the DEQ: “All wastewater, including aerosol drift that may result from the discharge, must remain within the boundaries that define the easement areas. The National Park Service has made it abundantly clear that allowing any wastewater onto land outside the boundary is unacceptable. The DEQ supports this position.”

• Your system has in fact produced documented ongoing contamination of surrounding Park land by drifting sewage spray for the past 18 years. Before it was reconstructed five years ago, you were advised by NPS and other concerned organizations to utilize a type of application which would not produce drifting sewage. It was made clear that any drift would not be tolerated. You installed a spray system.

• The sewage in question is only partially treated. Bacteria are permitted by your permit at levels suitable only for partial body contact. Additionally, enteric viruses and cyst-forming protozoans may be present. NPS employees are required to wear exposure suits, gas masks, and goggles when in the area. However, the aerosolized effluent is directly inhaled by any Park users who venture into that area at the wrong time.

• Because of this, the public has lost all use and benefit from surrounding Park lands (including part of the historic Thoreson Farm, part of the Port Oneida National Historic District) for the past 18 years. Because periodic contamination requires that the surrounding Park area be posted with warnings against entering, it constitutes a legal nuisance (“interfering with the rightful use of property by its owner”), prohibited by law and your DEQ permit. While no Park land around the disposal area should have to be closed because of your facility, it is clear that even more area should be closed beyond that which presently is; spray has been observed visibly blowing even beyond the warning signs, constituting a safety concern for Park users.

• Last year you made some minor changes in your system in hopes of eliminating the drift problem; however, drift still was observed at wind speeds as low as 6.3 mph.

• This is unacceptable to your neighbors in this area, to all who care about Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, and, we believe it is unacceptable to you. Even apart from legalities, surely you know that there is no better way to rouse the outrage of your community (or one who loves to visit here), than by desecrating our National Lakeshore.

• At this point the NPS is about to spend considerable public funds to create a scientific monitoring system to address this problem. Now, before those funds are spent, would be a great time for you to step up and offer to replace the sprayers with trickle irrigation or another acceptable alternative, and resolve the whole problem.

We invite you to respond with your views and plans. We will gladly post anything you share. (Email DreamingDuneBear@gmail.com.) We look forward to working with you, the NPS, and the DEQ to eliminate this hazard and restore the Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore that we all treasure.

Tom Van Zoeren
Maple City, MI

Leelanau Restaurant Guide
Leelanau Lodging Guide
Leelanau Shopping Guide
Leelanau Real Estate Guide
Leelanau Recreation Guide

Leelanau Vacation Rentals and LVR Real Estate